Trees & Tree Farming
Most people have a picture of traditional farming
as animals grazing in flat pastures, or as golden wheat waving in the
breeze. But we have not always used cereal husbandry as our primary
source of food.
In the Middle Ages, farmers of Western Europe used to herd livestock
into the deciduous forests where they could feed themselves on seeds,
nuts and berries from the trees. Larger trees such as Beech (Fagus sp),
Oak (Quercus sp), Walnut (Juglans regia), and Sweet Chestnut (Castanea
sativa) would often tolerate the growth of smaller food-bearing trees
beneath their branches (for instance Hazel, Corylus sp, Cobnuts and
Filberts etc.) making direct feeding easier for the animals (mostly
pigs).
This combination of several layers of vegetation represents
the most productive use of available sunlight and soil in a given land-area.
Manure from the animals would be dropped where it was most needed, automatically
ensuring that the woodland floor remained rich and fertile. Any surplus
food would be gathered by the farmer and stored as winter feed. Nutritionally,
the feed from this system is of a surprisingly high quality (see table
1) and compares very favourably with the cereal feeds currently used
on our farms. Shelled walnuts, for example, contain up to 16 per cent
protein, in addition to fat, calcium, iron and vitamins B1, Riboflavin
and Niacin.
However, since the Middle Ages, the use of cereals as a main crop superceded
tree-farming. As a result, farming became strictly governed by seasons,
with a premium put on planning one year ahead. Farmers could now settle
in one area but were committed to obeying the rigid cycle of a handful
of annual crops. Modern agriculture now has these grasses trained to
follow a simple uniform geometry, tailor-made for conveyor-belt machinery
on our flat farms.
In the rain forests of New Guinea, nomadic treefarmers still employ
a system of cultivation which we call 'swiddening' (derived from an
old Norse word meaning `clearing'). Firstly, a clearing is made in the
forest and the cuttings are either burned or composted to release their
nutrients. A garden is planted with a varied arrangement of vegetables
to ensure that variations in terrain are complemented by different plant
heights etc.
The crops are harvested sporadically, according to day-to-day needs,
in order to maintain uninterrupted continuity of growth throughout the
seasons. New tree shoots are carefully protected as they begin to grow
amongst the vegetables, since they allow the garden to mature untended
without undergoing a grassy stage. Because of their deep roots, the
young trees (referred to by the New Guineans as 'Duk Mi' -or `Mother
of Gardens') absorb the nutrients which run away through the vegetable
roots and which would otherwise be lost. On bare hills, by the introduction
of trees, nutrient run-off can be reduced by a factor of up to 100.
The New Guineans seldom keep their gardens for more than one year, moving
to a new location while the forest reclaims the last one. Pigs are kept
as a high protein investment for times of sickness or stress, and represent
their only method of food storage. In this way, even though less than
a tenth of the forest is `used' at any one time, it will support 200
people per square mile in complete ecological stability.
It is well-known that the major deserts were produced by cereal farming
on a large scale and consequent erosion of the soil. Some experimental,
work has been undertaken to re-introduce mixed economy tree-farming
in the tropics. Certain drought-resistant trees such as Algaroba (Prosopis
juliflora) and Carob (Ceratonia siliqua) have been used to upgrade poor
soils and to provide food for livestock and people.
Good varieties of
Algaroba can produce up to 50 tonnes per hectare annually (see table
2) in addition to their longrterm payoff in the form of timber. The
Algaroba pods are nutritionally superior to maize and can easily be
ground into meal for both human beings and for animals. Livestock may
be supported in this way on indifferent soil at densities of 5 to 12
large animals per hectare (cattle etc.) or up to 62 small animals per
hectare (sheep etc.).
Such abundance is not confined to tropical regions; one harvest from
a single mature Portuguese Oak has been shown to equal the output from
a whole acre of Maize, 1200 litres of Acorns.
TABLE 1.2 &3
Since only eight per cent of the world's land surface is suitable for
efficient cereal farming, it is difficult to see why Governments do
not take a long-term view and reforest the land for food. The only unsuitable
regions would be the ice-caps:- even Iceland has passed a bill in parliament
for extensive tree-planting to reduce both land-erosion and the price
of food.
In an intensive forest system, many by-products could be profitably
adapted for industries parallel with agriculture. Research carried out
by NW Pirie has shown that most leaves contain at least as much protein
as most vegetables in common use (see table 4).
It is a fairly simple
process to remove the fibrous matter and to produce a high-grade curd
for supplementing human or animal diet. This would provide an even greater
food output per hectare than suggested by conventional figures. Subsidiary
`crops' such as timber, honey, milk, chemicals, wool and wild game are
all benefits which would result naturally from a well-run tree-farm
economy.
Obviously, initial investment costs would be high for such a long-term
farming cycle, but there are one or two short cuts possible. The Juglans
sieboldiana species of Walnut is a quick-growing, high quality tree,
and Carob trees can bear crops within two to three years from planting.
Cereals and vegetables should grow adequately where trees are not fully
established, provided the leaf-cover is thin.
With intensive horticultural research and development, it is feasible
that Britain could become self-sufficient in food, whilst reducing its
dependence on fertilizers, pesticides and fuel.
TABLE 4